The importance of walking to public health

Purpose: There is clear evidence that physical activity, including walking, has substantial benefits for health. This article, prepared as part of the proceedings of a conference on walking and health, discusses the type of walking that produces substantial health benefits, considers several methodological issues pertinent to epidemiologic studies investigating the association of walking and health, and reviews some of the reasons for the large public health importance of walking.

Methods: Review of the available literature. Due to space constraints, this is not intended to be a comprehensive review; instead, selected studies are cited to illustrate the points raised.

Results: Walking as a healthful form of physical activity began to receive attention in the 1990s due to new recommendations that emphasized moderate-intensity physical activity. The main example of moderate-intensity activity in the 1995 Centers for Disease Control/American College of Sports Medicine recommendation was brisk walking at 3 to 4 mph. Evidence for the health benefits of walking comes largely from epidemiologic studies. When interpreting the data from such studies, it is necessary to consider several methodological issues, including the design of the study, confounding by other lifestyle behaviors, and confounding by other kinds of physical activity. Walking has the potential to have a large public health impact due to its accessibility, its documented health benefits, and the fact that effective programs to promote walking already exist.

Conclusions: Walking is a simple health behavior that can reduce rates of chronic disease and ameliorate rising health care costs, with only a modest increase in the number of activity-related injuries.

Similar articles

Haennel RG, Lemire F. Haennel RG, et al. Can Fam Physician. 2002 Jan;48:65-71. Can Fam Physician. 2002. PMID: 11852614 Free PMC article. Review.

Caspersen CJ, Fulton JE. Caspersen CJ, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S519-28. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c6737. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008. PMID: 18562969 Review.

Tercyak KP, Tyc VL. Tercyak KP, et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006 Sep;31(8):750-63. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj126. Epub 2006 Jul 4. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16820383 Review.

Roux L, Pratt M, Tengs TO, Yore MM, Yanagawa TL, Van Den Bos J, Rutt C, Brownson RC, Powell KE, Heath G, Kohl HW 3rd, Teutsch S, Cawley J, Lee IM, West L, Buchner DM. Roux L, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Dec;35(6):578-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.040. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 19000846

Bassuk SS, Manson JE. Bassuk SS, et al. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jul;20(6):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Apr 15. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010. PMID: 20399084 Review.

Cited by

O'Reilly D, White M, Langenheim N, Alambeigi P. O'Reilly D, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(8):1080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081080. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39200689 Free PMC article. Review.

Wang W, Ruan H, Shen Y, Cheng J, Sun W, Huang C. Wang W, et al. Digit Health. 2024 Aug 14;10:20552076241272589. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272589. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39148809 Free PMC article. Review.

Walia AS, King AC, Campero MI, Garcia DM, Lee RE, Zamora AN. Walia AS, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 9;21(5):607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050607. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38791821 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

Timmins IR, Zaccardi F, Yates T, Dudbridge F. Timmins IR, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 May 1;14(1):9995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60398-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38693307 Free PMC article.

Baroudi L, Barton K, Cain SM, Shorter KA. Baroudi L, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 6;14(1):3039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53143-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38321039 Free PMC article.